packages for libwebsocket and libwebsocket-devel can be found in the remi 
repository 
(https://rpms.remirepo.net/enterprise/8/remi/x86_64/repoview/libwebsockets-devel.html)
 
although this seems to be an outdated or at least older version (and you need 
to decide for yourself whether it is a safe/trustworth source)

regarding libjpeg-turbo-devel, i would stick to the package shiped with 
centos/rhel,
but from compareing the shiped package:
rpm -ql  libjpeg-turbo-devel
/usr/include/jconfig-64.h
/usr/include/jconfig.h
/usr/include/jerror.h
/usr/include/jmorecfg.h
/usr/include/jpegint.h
/usr/include/jpeglib.h
/usr/lib64/libjpeg.so
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libjpeg.pc  

with the rpm provided by the developer, 
rpm2cpio libjpeg-turbo-official-2.0.4.x86_64.rpm | cpio -civt | grep -E 
".h$|.pc$|.so "
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root     root        46866 Dec 31 08:26 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/bin/tjbench
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root         2166 Dec 31 08:24 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/include/jconfig.h
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        15177 Dec 31 08:10 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/include/jerror.h
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        15143 Dec 31 08:10 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/include/jmorecfg.h
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        50281 Dec 31 08:10 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/include/jpeglib.h
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        73889 Dec 31 08:10 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/include/turbojpeg.h
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root           13 Dec 31 08:26 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/lib64/libjpeg.so -> libjpeg.so.62
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root           17 Dec 31 08:26 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/lib64/libturbojpeg.so -> libturbojpeg.so.0
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root          279 Dec 31 08:24 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/lib64/pkgconfig/libjpeg.pc
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root          291 Dec 31 08:24 
./opt/libjpeg-turbo/lib64/pkgconfig/libturbojpeg.pc

there are at least some of the headers, so to me it looks like devel files are 
included in this package...



On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 21:44 CEST, Nick Couchman <[email protected]> wrote:
 On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:21 AM Zer0Cool <[email protected]> wrote:Hello,

I have been working on adapting my script for installing and configuring
Guac on RHEL/CentOS 7.x to working with 8.x. (current 7.x version here for
reference: https://github.com/Zer0CoolX/guacamole-install-rhel).

One of the biggest challenges I am facing is with package names changing or
packages being removed entirely from official repos (and even trustworthy
3rd party repos) with RHEL/CentOS 8.x. It seems as if the page:
https://guacamole.apache.org/doc/gug/installing-guacamole.html has not been
updated to reflect RHEL/CentOS 8.x
  No, that documentation has not been updated to reflect these changes. Good 
examples are as follows:

- libtelnet
- libtelnet-devel
- libwebsocket
- libwebsocket-devel
- libssh2
- libssh2-devel

It appears these packages are no longer in the official repos. Is there
another trustworthy/reliable repo to grab them from? To be honest, I am not
too worried about telnet, but Kubernetes support seems like something
I/people would want to have and while epel-testing lists libwebsockets it
will not install (needs libuv and cant find it). I did find libssh2 in epel
and that appears to be installable.
  libtelnet has always been part of the EPEL repo, I believe.  I think someone 
mentioned recently that libssh2 has been added, as well. Beyond that, we're 
also looking at moving guacd (back) to libssh instead of libssh2. Tomcat has 
also been removed from the repos, seemingly on purpose by Red
Hat. Is the best way to use Tomcat on RHEL/CentOS 8.x to get the tar.gz
direct from the official site and unpack it/configure it or is there a
trustworthy/reliable repo with Tomcat 9.x for RHEL/CentOS 8.x I am unaware
of?
  This is what I do, anyway.  I think EL7 shipped with Tomcat 7 or something 
like that, and they never did much in the way of updating it, so I always pull 
Tomcat down from the Tomcat page to get the latest.  EL8 probably ships with 
JBOSS, since RedHat maintains that. Laslty, libjpeg-turbo. The dev has a yum 
repo that I have used, but it
appears it only pulls libjpeg-turbo and not libjpeg-turbo-devel. Is there
any benefit to having LJT 2.x (or whatever the latest version is) with the
LJT-devel package from official repos (1.5.x I think at this time)? Should I
just use both versions from the OS repos (1.5.x)?
  Not sure on this one - I think whatever is available should be fine.  The 
install instructions mention both libjpeg-turbo-devel and libjpeg-devel. -Nick
 

Reply via email to