On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:41 PM Jason Keltz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi. > > Because of issues with balancing groups in my implementation, I am using > organizational groups. However, the concurrency limits at the group level > apply to balancing groups only. In the GUI, it actually says: "CONCURRENCY > LIMITS (BALANCING GROUPS)". I'm not sure why? It makes sense to me to be > able to still restrict users to a certain number of connections within a > connection group. I can limit to a number of connections to an individual > machine, but not at the group level. Isn't the code similar anyway? > > This was covered in another recent thread, but the concurrency limits only apply to connections made directly to a balancing group. So, if you have a balancing group, and you set the connection limit on that group to a maximum of 5 connections, and 1 connection per user, but you give users the ability to see and access the underlying connections within that balancing group, the limits you set at the balancing group level *will not apply* to the connections made directly to the underlying connection. The limits are not intended to be a hierarchical set of limits that are inherited down through the connections or summed up at the top - they apply only to whatever object you are connecting to. Since an organizational group does not support having connections made directly to it, setting limits on it doesn't have any effect. -Nick
