This isn't official? I thought since it was in the docs and didn't say it was 3rd party that it was.
https://guacamole.apache.org/doc/0.9.0/gug/installing-guacamole.html#idp98448 It looks like flatpak is more desktop oriented, so snap may be the way to go with that. That being said, containerizing stuff seems to be how Linux is going to fix compatibility issues in many respects. I personally use distrobox (with podman) where I can't get flatpaks or snaps to work on the desktop for instance. On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 1:15 PM Michael Jumper <mjum...@apache.org> wrote: > On 6/12/23 10:07, Doug Baggett wrote: > > Oh, I understand. And that's OK. You'all provide the PPA and thats good. > > ... > Any PPA that you've found would also be a third-party PPA. The Guacamole > project itself does not provide a PPA. > > > On another note, obviously running it in a Docker instance is a thing > > and LOTS of people do that. What about a snap or flatpak? Has there been > > any consideration of that? > > > > Yes, I've been looking into snap recently. I think this could be > interesting. I have not yet looked into flatpak. > > - Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@guacamole.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@guacamole.apache.org > >
