Nick, with respect to the docker instance, does that include FreeRDP2 or 
FreeRDP3?

thanks


Tony
From: Nick Couchman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2025 9:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [External] Question about current state of RDP + Kerberos support 
in Guacamole

On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 8:53 AM steph01 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi everyone,

I’m trying to understand the current state of RDP and Kerberos integration in 
Apache Guacamole.
I remember that some work was done around version 1.6.0, but from what I 
recall, it was later marked as experimental or incomplete.
The only change relevant to this that 1.6.0 includes is the ability to use 
FreeRDP3, which supports Kerberos-based authentication, whereas FreeRDP2 does 
not.

Could someone clarify:

  *   What’s the current status of Kerberos authentication for RDP connections 
in the latest Guacamole versions?
It's sort of a "your mileage may vary" situation. There are some situations in 
which Guacamole 1.6.0 + FreeRDP3 should actually work fine authenticating via 
Kerberos - if your environment is set up in such a way that NTLM is not allowed 
and Kerberos is required, and FreeRDP3 is built with support for it, then 
Guacamole/FreeRDP may just negotiate up to the Kerberos standard transparently. 
However, if FreeRDP3 happens to be built without Kerberos support, or some 
issue occurs in negotiating that connectivity, it may fail the logon. In the 
released versions of Guacamole, there's no way to force the use of Kerberos 
over NTLM.

  *
  *   Is it functional and stable enough for testing in production-like 
environments?
  *   What’s the recommended way to test and verify its behavior today (e.g. 
specific build flags, guacd parameters, or configuration examples)?
The best way to test is to configure your Windows Servers to not allow NTLM 
authentication and try to connect to them with Guacamole. You can also use 
xfreerdp to verify you've set that up correctly, using the /auth-pkg-list 
parameter to verify that you are unable connect if you specify only ntlm 
(ntlm,!kerberos), and able to connect only if you specify no NTLM and only 
Kerberos (!ntlm,kerberos). If you validate with xfreerdp, and then are able to 
connect with Guacamole, you are using Kerberos authentication. If it works as 
expected with xfreerdp but fails with Guacamole, you've got some issue, there - 
either the inability to negotiate it correctly, or FreeRDP isn't built with 
Kerberos, or you're using a version of FreeRDP that doesn't support it.

I've opened a couple of pull requests to try to handle this. They are currently 
in Draft state, and I've had some mixed results from people testing - it works 
fine for me, and I think one other person has reported success, but another has 
reported still being unable to connect. They changes aren't terribly invasive - 
they're not likely to break anything production-level, just some connection 
parameter changes - but they aren't released, yet, so...try it if you like, but 
you've been warned :-).

https://github.com/apache/guacamole-server/pull/581<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_guacamole-2Dserver_pull_581&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=FAi7_Un_xIwqyE1tNdU-gb08bRZLlfxR_VZo5-zbQF0&m=b84eJweHiil_udBlVmqE2QZ79e2aN3JyBH_402H7oSqivbJEiuvsiKwH3pDj0s9J&s=48oAV3L6PSrbiooREw2xwYhDOBzmt58OgJagGLMWXzM&e=>
https://github.com/apache/guacamole-client/pull/1082<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_guacamole-2Dclient_pull_1082&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=FAi7_Un_xIwqyE1tNdU-gb08bRZLlfxR_VZo5-zbQF0&m=b84eJweHiil_udBlVmqE2QZ79e2aN3JyBH_402H7oSqivbJEiuvsiKwH3pDj0s9J&s=NAxv3oat-aJuNuKtQwAqz8oAKT9AxV3eAi2daYPD_74&e=>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-2057<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GUACAMOLE-2D2057&d=DwMFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=FAi7_Un_xIwqyE1tNdU-gb08bRZLlfxR_VZo5-zbQF0&m=b84eJweHiil_udBlVmqE2QZ79e2aN3JyBH_402H7oSqivbJEiuvsiKwH3pDj0s9J&s=mJome8cdqiiwXhnhgBV7yOfBIZjeQyExaHC7Nz8WGgk&e=>

The main thing that needs to be fixed is the ability for the autoconf script to 
detect the support/presence of FreeRDP with Kerberos, which I haven't quite 
nailed down, yet.

-Nick




________________________________

This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. 
Click 
here<https://us1.proofpointessentials.com/app/report_spam.php?mod_id=11&mod_option=logitem&report=1&type=easyspam&k=k1&payload=53616c7465645f5f940e2fb93145cd5cfed43e62f0dd85a2fae990c6eb81ac5ae3b5c6dba80351b08d8bf7ca05a0c3b9b965ce76710d291ef03ea1c405a5d2e64204c43edcf3ab20545040d67fd5405fccae7e170832d1062ee62bff7fc8aa72509884719a415b2e3ff25bfe6b6a471e229875ecb937af5ec446a8032cc205359435b591d94efc57877ae9bf10e79a3168dad8a0c8aca1bc20f0503d693b03ca>
 to report this email as spam.

Reply via email to