Hello, sorry for the delayed Information.
1) yes, guacamole packages have from the Distribution are not installed (apt list --installed |grep gua does not Show anything related) 2) root@guacamole:/var/log# ldd /usr/local/sbin/guacd | grep guac libguac.so.12 => /usr/local/lib/libguac.so.12 (0x00007f41922f7000) root@guacamole:/var/log# ldd /usr/local/sbin/guacd | grep guac libguac.so.12 => /usr/local/lib/libguac.so.12 (0x00007feb66a3f000) Thanks, Philip ________________________________ Von: Mike Jumper <[email protected]> Gesendet: Montag, 24. April 2017 04:52 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: vnc guacd segfault after upgrading from 0.9.10 to 0.9.12 1) Can you confirm that you haven't installed Guacamole packages provided by your distribution? Such packages would conflict with the result of the build, resulting in guacd loading older, binary-incompatible versions of its protocol support plugins. 2) What is the output of: ldd /usr/local/sbin/guacd | grep guac and: ldd /usr/local/lib/libguac-client-vnc.so | grep guac ? Thanks, - Mike On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Philip Herbert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > > > after upgrading from 0.9.10 to 0.9.12 I can no longer connect via vnc. > > > > Apr 22 00:38:00 guacamole guacd[3189]: Creating new client for protocol > "vnc" > > Apr 22 00:38:00 guacamole guacd[3189]: Connection ID is > "$1d54e86d-fd79-466e-b22f-425510b76060" > > Apr 22 00:38:00 guacamole guacd[3682]: Cursor rendering: local > > Apr 22 00:38:00 guacamole guacd[3682]: User > "@28231e99-aed6-47c9-8d01-8437597cb0b6" joined connection > "$1d54e86d-fd79-466e-b22f-425510b76060" (1 users now present) > > Apr 22 00:38:00 guacamole kernel: [ 2137.939066] guacd[3689]: segfault at > 57d00 ip 00007f5bfabd5472 sp 00007f5bfb7fdd68 error 4 in > libvncclient.so.1.0.0[7f5bfabcb000+1e000] > > Apr 22 00:38:00 guacamole guacd[3189]: Connection > "$1d54e86d-fd79-466e-b22f-425510b76060" removed. > > > > system is ubuntu LT 14.04, both guac versions (old and new) have been build > from source. > > > > Any Idea ? > > > > Thanks, Philip > > > >
