On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Dogbert <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > > I have debugged through this and it does get called, how would I be able to > check the difference? In Firefox I found an extension that showed web-socket > traffic and that works, although on chrome is where I see a bunch of get > requests for images, for the same setup, but it seems to run smoothly. > Although it shouldn't make a difference, because I'm on centos 6, I'm stuck > at Chrome 49. >
Those are not HTTP GET requests, but rather Chrome simply loading images from data URLs (the mechanism Guacamole uses to load images received over the connection). You should be able to exclude that noise by checking the "Hide data URLs" box. If those are the only requests present, and you don't see any GET requests to the HTTP tunnel, it sounds like WebSocket is working correctly. - Mike
