Just clarifying because of the reference to mainframe.... IBM BigInsights runs on clusters of x86 servers.
John From: Michael Segel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Date: 09/20/2012 05:25 AM Subject: Re: IBM big insights distribution Why is it that when anyone asks a question about IBM Tom wants to take it off line? Not very social. I personally find it interesting that IBM requires that their products are tied to IBM's JVM. I also wonder about the cost of running Hadoop on the mainframe. (Linux LPARs while cheaper, still cost mips. ) [Forgive me, its been a while since I spoke mainframe] So what's the real advantage from an architecture point of view? On Sep 19, 2012, at 6:39 PM, Tom Deutsch <[email protected]> wrote: > Serge - let's take this off list. Ping me directly and we'll take it from there. > > --------------------------------------- > Sent from my Blackberry so please excuse typing and spelling errors. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Serge Blazhiyevskyy [[email protected]] > Sent: 09/19/2012 03:16 PM CST > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: IBM big insights distribution > > > > Hi all, > > Anybody had a success compiling Map reduce jobs with big insights distro on MAC? > > Seems like it requires IBM java JDK and it might not be available on MAC. > > Is there a way work around it? > > > Thanks > Serge > > > >
