Hi Koert & Harsh,

Regarding LdapGroupsMapping, I have questions:

1.      Is it possible to use ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping for Hadoop service 
principals/users, and LdapGroupsMapping for end user accounts?

In our  environment, normal end users (along with their groups info) for Hadoop 
cluster are from AD, and for them we should use the ldap mapping;

but for hdfs/mapred service principals, the default shell based one is enough, 
and we don't want to create the user/group entries in AD just for that.

2.      Can we support multiple ADs? Hadoop users might come from more than ONE 
AD in big org.

3.      Is there any technical  issue not to support LDAPs like OpenLDAP? In my 
understanding, one possible difficulity might be that it's not easy to extract 
common

group lookup mechanism with common filters/configurations both for AD and 
OpenLDAP like, right?

I'm wondering if these are just limits for current implementation, and if so if 
we need to improve that. Might the community has already been going for that?


Thanks

Kai

From: Ivan Frain [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 2:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Secure hadoop and group permission on HDFS

Hi Koert,

Another option is to use the LdapGroupsMapping which picks up the group 
membership from a LDAP directory.
You can find more details on the JIRA issue: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8121
Up to now, it is available for ActiveDirectory and released in 
hadoop-2.0.0-alpha and next releases.
You can easily apply the patch on a 0.23.1, I already did that and it works 
well.

OpenLdap with POSIX groups is not yet supported by this patch, it was tailored 
for ActiveDirectory.


BR,
Ivan

2012/10/9 Harsh J <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Koert,

If you use the org.apache.hadoop.security.ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping
class (via hadoop.security.group.mapping), then yes the NameNode's
view of the local unix groups (and the primary group) of the user is
the final say on what groups the user belongs to. This can be relied
on - but note that HDFS uses BSD style semantics when it comes to
groups and when creating directories/files, the parent directory
groups are inherited automatically unless altered after creation.

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Koert Kuipers 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> With secure hadoop the user name is authenticated by the kerberos server.
> But what about the groups that the user is a member of? Are these simple the
> groups that the user is a member of on the namenode machine?
> Is it viable to manage access to files on HDFS using groups on a secure
> hadoop cluster?
>


--
Harsh J



--
Ivan Frain
11, route de Grenade
31530 Saint-Paul-sur-Save
mobile: +33 (0)6 52 52 47 07


Reply via email to