Azuryy, 1.1.2 < 1.2.0. Its not an upgrade you're suggesting there. If you feel there's been a regression, can you comment that on the JIRA?
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Azuryy Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > yes. hadoop-1.1.2 was released on Jan. 31st. just download it. > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Lanati, Matteo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Azuryy, >> >> thanks for the update. Sorry for the silly question, but where can I >> download the patched version? >> If I look into the closest mirror (i.e. >> http://mirror.netcologne.de/apache.org/hadoop/common/), I can see that the >> Hadoop 1.1.2 version was last updated on Jan. 31st. >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Matteo >> >> PS: just to confirm that I tried a minimal Hadoop 1.2.0 setup, so without >> any security, and the problem is there. >> >> On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Azuryy Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > can you upgrade to 1.1.2, which is also a stable release, and fixed the >> > bug you facing now. >> > >> > --Send from my Sony mobile. >> > >> > On Jun 2, 2013 3:23 AM, "Shahab Yunus" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Thanks Harsh for the reply. I was confused too that why security is >> > causing this. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Shahab >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Shahab - I see he has mentioned generally that security is enabled >> > (but not that it happens iff security is enabled), and the issue here >> > doesn't have anything to do with security really. >> > >> > Azurry - Lets discuss the code issues on the JIRA (instead of here) or >> > on the mapreduce-dev lists. >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Shahab Yunus <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > HI Harsh, >> > > >> > > Quick question though: why do you think it only happens if the OP >> > > 'uses >> > > security' as he mentioned? >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Shahab >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Does smell like a bug as that number you get is simply >> > >> Long.MAX_VALUE, >> > >> or 8 exbibytes. >> > >> >> > >> Looking at the sources, this turns out to be a rather funny Java >> > >> issue >> > >> (there's a divide by zero happening and [1] suggests Long.MAX_VALUE >> > >> return in such a case). I've logged a bug report for this at >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5288 with a >> > >> reproducible case. >> > >> >> > >> Does this happen consistently for you? >> > >> >> > >> [1] >> > >> >> > >> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/Math.html#round(double) >> > >> >> > >> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Lanati, Matteo <[email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > >> > >> > I stumbled upon this problem as well while trying to run the >> > >> > default >> > >> > wordcount shipped with Hadoop 1.2.0. My testbed is made up of 2 >> > >> > virtual >> > >> > machines: Debian 7, Oracle Java 7, 2 GB RAM, 25 GB hard disk. One >> > >> > node is >> > >> > used as JT+NN, the other as TT+DN. Security is enabled. The input >> > >> > file is >> > >> > about 600 kB and the error is >> > >> > >> > >> > 2013-06-01 12:22:51,999 WARN >> > >> > org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: No >> > >> > room for map task. Node 10.156.120.49 has 22854692864 bytes free; >> > >> > but we >> > >> > expect map to take 9223372036854775807 >> > >> > >> > >> > The logfile is attached, together with the configuration files. The >> > >> > version I'm using is >> > >> > >> > >> > Hadoop 1.2.0 >> > >> > Subversion >> > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/branches/branch-1.2 >> > >> > -r >> > >> > 1479473 >> > >> > Compiled by hortonfo on Mon May 6 06:59:37 UTC 2013 >> > >> > From source with checksum 2e0dac51ede113c1f2ca8e7d82fb3405 >> > >> > This command was run using >> > >> > /home/lu95jib/hadoop-exmpl/hadoop-1.2.0/hadoop-core-1.2.0.jar >> > >> > >> > >> > If I run the default configuration (i.e. no securty), then the job >> > >> > succeeds. >> > >> > >> > >> > Is there something missing in how I set up my nodes? How is it >> > >> > possible >> > >> > that the envisaged value for the needed space is so big? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks in advance. >> > >> > >> > >> > Matteo >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >>Which version of Hadoop are you using. A quick search shows me a >> > >> >> bug >> > >> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5241 that seems to >> > >> >> show >> > >> >>similar symptoms. However, that was fixed a long while ago. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >>On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Redwane belmaati cherkaoui < >> > >> >>[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >>> This the content of the jobtracker log file : >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,912 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> Input >> > >> >>> size for job job_201303231139_0001 = 6950001. Number of splits = >> > >> >>> 7 >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,925 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> tip:task_201303231139_0001_m_000000 has split on >> > >> >>> node:/default-rack/hadoop0.novalocal >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,927 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> tip:task_201303231139_0001_m_000001 has split on >> > >> >>> node:/default-rack/hadoop0.novalocal >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,930 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> tip:task_201303231139_0001_m_000002 has split on >> > >> >>> node:/default-rack/hadoop0.novalocal >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,931 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> tip:task_201303231139_0001_m_000003 has split on >> > >> >>> node:/default-rack/hadoop0.novalocal >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,933 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> tip:task_201303231139_0001_m_000004 has split on >> > >> >>> node:/default-rack/hadoop0.novalocal >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,934 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> tip:task_201303231139_0001_m_000005 has split on >> > >> >>> node:/default-rack/hadoop0.novalocal >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,939 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> tip:task_201303231139_0001_m_000006 has split on >> > >> >>> node:/default-rack/hadoop0.novalocal >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,950 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> job_201303231139_0001 LOCALITY_WAIT_FACTOR=0.5 >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:48,978 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> Job >> > >> >>> job_201303231139_0001 initialized successfully with 7 map tasks >> > >> >>> and 1 >> > >> >>> reduce tasks. >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:06:50,855 INFO org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobTracker: >> > >> >>> Adding >> > >> >>> task (JOB_SETUP) 'attempt_201303231139_0001_m_000008_0' to tip >> > >> >>> task_201303231139_0001_m_000008, for tracker >> > >> >>> 'tracker_hadoop0.novalocal:hadoop0.novalocal/127.0.0.1:44879' >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:08:00,340 INFO >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> Task >> > >> >>> 'attempt_201303231139_0001_m_000008_0' has completed >> > >> >>> task_201303231139_0001_m_000008 successfully. >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:08:00,538 WARN >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> No >> > >> >>> room for map task. Node hadoop0.novalocal has 8791543808 bytes >> > >> >>> free; >> > >> >>> but we >> > >> >>> expect map to take 1317624576693539401 >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:08:00,543 WARN >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> No >> > >> >>> room for map task. Node hadoop0.novalocal has 8791543808 bytes >> > >> >>> free; >> > >> >>> but we >> > >> >>> expect map to take 1317624576693539401 >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:08:00,544 WARN >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> No >> > >> >>> room for map task. Node hadoop0.novalocal has 8791543808 bytes >> > >> >>> free; >> > >> >>> but we >> > >> >>> expect map to take 1317624576693539401 >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:08:00,544 WARN >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> No >> > >> >>> room for map task. Node hadoop0.novalocal has 8791543808 bytes >> > >> >>> free; >> > >> >>> but we >> > >> >>> expect map to take 1317624576693539401 >> > >> >>> 2013-03-23 12:08:01,264 WARN >> > >> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: >> > >> >>> No >> > >> >>> room for map task. Node hadoop1.novalocal has 8807518208 bytes >> > >> >>> free; >> > >> >>> but we >> > >> >>> expect map to take 1317624576693539401 >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> The value in we excpect map to take is too huge >> > >> >>> 1317624576693539401 >> > >> >>> bytes !!!!!!! >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Redwane belmaati cherkaoui < >> > >> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>>> The estimated value that the hadoop compute is too huge for the >> > >> >>>> simple >> > >> >>>> example that i am running . >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > >> >>>> From: Redwane belmaati cherkaoui <[email protected]> >> > >> >>>> Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:32 AM >> > >> >>>> Subject: Re: About running a simple wordcount mapreduce >> > >> >>>> To: Abdelrahman Shettia <[email protected]> >> > >> >>>> Cc: [email protected], reduno1985 <[email protected]> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> This the output that I get I am running two machines as you can >> > >> >>>> see >> > >> >>>> do >> > >> >>>> u see anything suspicious ? >> > >> >>>> Configured Capacity: 21145698304 (19.69 GB) >> > >> >>>> Present Capacity: 17615499264 (16.41 GB) >> > >> >>>> DFS Remaining: 17615441920 (16.41 GB) >> > >> >>>> DFS Used: 57344 (56 KB) >> > >> >>>> DFS Used%: 0% >> > >> >>>> Under replicated blocks: 0 >> > >> >>>> Blocks with corrupt replicas: 0 >> > >> >>>> Missing blocks: 0 >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> ------------------------------------------------- >> > >> >>>> Datanodes available: 2 (2 total, 0 dead) >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Name: 11.1.0.6:50010 >> > >> >>>> Decommission Status : Normal >> > >> >>>> Configured Capacity: 10572849152 (9.85 GB) >> > >> >>>> DFS Used: 28672 (28 KB) >> > >> >>>> Non DFS Used: 1765019648 (1.64 GB) >> > >> >>>> DFS Remaining: 8807800832(8.2 GB) >> > >> >>>> DFS Used%: 0% >> > >> >>>> DFS Remaining%: 83.31% >> > >> >>>> Last contact: Sat Mar 23 11:30:10 CET 2013 >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Name: 11.1.0.3:50010 >> > >> >>>> Decommission Status : Normal >> > >> >>>> Configured Capacity: 10572849152 (9.85 GB) >> > >> >>>> DFS Used: 28672 (28 KB) >> > >> >>>> Non DFS Used: 1765179392 (1.64 GB) >> > >> >>>> DFS Remaining: 8807641088(8.2 GB) >> > >> >>>> DFS Used%: 0% >> > >> >>>> DFS Remaining%: 83.3% >> > >> >>>> Last contact: Sat Mar 23 11:30:08 CET 2013 >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Abdelrahman Shettia < >> > >> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>>> Hi Redwane, >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Please run the following command as hdfs user on any datanode. >> > >> >>>>> The >> > >> >>>>> output will be something like this. Hope this helps >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> hadoop dfsadmin -report >> > >> >>>>> Configured Capacity: 81075068925 (75.51 GB) >> > >> >>>>> Present Capacity: 70375292928 (65.54 GB) >> > >> >>>>> DFS Remaining: 69895163904 (65.09 GB) >> > >> >>>>> DFS Used: 480129024 (457.89 MB) >> > >> >>>>> DFS Used%: 0.68% >> > >> >>>>> Under replicated blocks: 0 >> > >> >>>>> Blocks with corrupt replicas: 0 >> > >> >>>>> Missing blocks: 0 >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Thanks >> > >> >>>>> -Abdelrahman >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, reduno1985 >> > >> >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> I have my hosts running on openstack virtual machine instances >> > >> >>>>>> each >> > >> >>>>>> instance has 10gb hard disc . Is there a way too see how much >> > >> >>>>>> space >> > >> >>>>>> is in >> > >> >>>>>> the hdfs without web ui . >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Sent from Samsung Mobile >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Serge Blazhievsky <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>> Check web ui how much space you have on hdfs??? >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> On Mar 22, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Abdelrahman Shettia < >> > >> >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Hi Redwane , >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> It is possible that the hosts which are running tasks are do >> > >> >>>>>> not >> > >> >>>>>> have >> > >> >>>>>> enough space. Those dirs are confiugred in mapred-site.xml >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Redwane belmaati cherkaoui < >> > >> >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > >> >>>>>>> From: Redwane belmaati cherkaoui <[email protected]> >> > >> >>>>>>> Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:39 PM >> > >> >>>>>>> Subject: About running a simple wordcount mapreduce >> > >> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Hi >> > >> >>>>>>> I am trying to run a wordcount mapreduce job on several >> > >> >>>>>>> files >> > >> >>>>>>> (<20 >> > >> >>>>>>> mb) using two machines . I get stuck on 0% map 0% reduce. >> > >> >>>>>>> The jobtracker log file shows the following warning: >> > >> >>>>>>> WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobInProgress: No room for map >> > >> >>>>>>> task. >> > >> >>>>>>> Node hadoop0.novalocal has 8791384064 bytes free; but we >> > >> >>>>>>> expect >> > >> >>>>>>> map to >> > >> >>take >> > >> >>>>>>> 1317624576693539401 >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Please help me , >> > >> >>>>>>> Best Regards, >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Matteo Lanati >> > >> > Distributed Resources Group >> > >> > Leibniz-Rechenzentrum (LRZ) >> > >> > Boltzmannstrasse 1 >> > >> > 85748 Garching b. München (Germany) >> > >> > Phone: +49 89 35831 8724 >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Harsh J >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Harsh J >> > >> >> Matteo Lanati >> Distributed Resources Group >> Leibniz-Rechenzentrum (LRZ) >> Boltzmannstrasse 1 >> 85748 Garching b. München (Germany) >> Phone: +49 89 35831 8724 >> > -- Harsh J
