Yes, I think you are right.

(2014/04/16 1:20), Manoj Samel wrote:
So, is it correct to say that if one wants to get the latest state of
the Name node, the information from imageviewer and from edits viewer
has to be combined somehow ?

Thanks,


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Akira AJISAKA
<ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp <mailto:ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>> wrote:

    If you want to parse the edits, please use the Offline Edits Viewer.
    
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/__r2.4.0/hadoop-project-dist/__hadoop-hdfs/HdfsEditsViewer.__html
    
<http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.4.0/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-hdfs/HdfsEditsViewer.html>

    Thanks,
    Akira


    (2014/04/15 16:41), Mingjiang Shi wrote:

        I think you are right because the the offline image viewer only
        takes
        the fsimage file as input.


        On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Manoj Samel
        <manojsamelt...@gmail.com <mailto:manojsamelt...@gmail.com>
        <mailto:manojsameltech@gmail.__com
        <mailto:manojsamelt...@gmail.com>>> wrote:

             Hi,

             Is it correct to say that the offline image viewer does not
        accounts
             for any edits that are not yet merged into the fsimage?

             Thanks,





        --
        Cheers
        -MJ




Reply via email to