Can’t speak for the rest of the Hadoop community but we use Lingual. Not sure if that’s common or not.
Maybe worth posting the same question to @hbase. From: John Lilley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 12:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: HBase metadata Sorry to be rude, but what does everyone actually use now? We are an ISV and need to support the most common access pattern. john From: Martin, Nick [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:53 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: HBase metadata Have you looked @ Lingual? From: John Lilley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 12:43 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: HBase metadata Those look intriguing. But what do people actually use today? Is it all application-specific coding? Hive? John From: Mirko Kämpf [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:12 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: HBase metadata Hi John, I suggest the project: http://www.kiji.org/ or even the brand new: http://phoenix.apache.org/ Cheers, Mirko 2014-07-08 16:05 GMT+00:00 John Lilley <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: Greetings! We would like to support HBase in a general manner, having our software connect to any HBase table and read/write it in a row-oriented fashion. However, as we explore HBase, the raw interface is at a very low level -- basically a map from binary record keys to named columns. So my question about metadata standards. What do users mostly do to use HBase for row-oriented access? It is always going through Hive? Thanks john
