Suraj, Outside review would be unbiased and that is one of the option. But, instead of waiting for a good outside samaritan who is interested in Hama/Giraph/Mahout and others to do an unbiased review, it would good to get started with something. Also, not sure if someone from outside would do it without any $.
Praveen On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Suraj Menon <[email protected]> wrote: > @Billy, completely agree, I gave a similar message at Apache BarCamp > DC last week. > > @Praveen, I am sorry, I differ with you here. :) The Hama wiki should > only explain Hama performance. In my personal opinion, this should be > done by any interested user/developer outside. Hopefully, we would be > proud to share that link. > > -Suraj > > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Billy Newport <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think the difference may be that Hama provides a bsp base with graph > > also. Giraph seems to just do graph. With Hama becoming a top level > > apache project now, it's hard to see giraph making it also given the > > overlap. My vote would be for giraph to combine forces and enhance > > Hama but we will see, I guess. > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On May 26, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Praveen Sripati <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> If I see the benchmarks [1], it's always Hama against Hama. While this > is > >> absolutely necessary to make sure Hama doesn't regress, it's even more > >> necessary to compare (functionality, performance, algorithms etc) Hama > with > >> others. > >> > >> Couldn't agree more with Suraj on benchmarks to benchmarks comparison. > >> Since everything is available as open source it should be possible to > do a > >> comparison with the same data set with out-of-the-box software without > any > >> fine tuning for different algorithms. > >> > >> Just my 2c. > >> > >> Praveen > >> > >> [1] - http://wiki.apache.org/hama/Benchmarks > >> > >> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected] > >wrote: > >> > >>> and also, GraphLab, and Spark. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Praveen Sripati > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> What advantages does Hama offer over Giraph for graph processing? > >>>> > >>>> After watching the following video (http://vimeo.com/40737998) both > Hama > >>>> and Giraph seems to have somewhat similar API approach for graph > >>>> processing. Both of them extend/implement a vertex class and implement > >>> the > >>>> compute method. > >>>> > >>>> We can may be covert this discussion into a Wiki. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Praveen > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >>> @eddieyoon > >>> >
