This might help you slightly.

http://www.quora.com/I-am-looking-at-BSP-Bulk-Synchronous-Parallel-solutions-on-the-cloud-that-integrate-with-Hadoop-It-appears-that-Hama-and-Giraph-are-most-promising-What-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-each-one-of-them



--
Regards,
Apurv Verma




On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>wrote:

> In my private opinion,
>
> = What's difference of the two projects? =
>
> Hama pursues the general BSP computing engine, so it provides an
> chance of any additional programming models on top of BSP model. For
> example, Hama can be used for Pregel-like graph computing model,
> Machine Learning algorithms, and MRQL's complex query processing.
>
> Giraph is different in the sense that it focused only on
> "vertex-centric graph model" and it runs as a map-only job. So, it
> have a dependence of Map/Reduce framework.
>
> = What's the HAMA's target in the future? =
>
> A scalable and fast distributed computing engine for massive
> scientific computations such as matrix, graph and network algorithms.
> Also, we're trying to support C/C++ interface, easy-to-use query
> language (with MRQL project), and GPGPU acceleration.
>
> = HAMA's advantage VS Giraph at present? =
>
> In terms of graph computing qualities, Hama's graph package and Giraph
> support almost same APIs because we cloned a Google's Pregel. One
> different thing is a VertexInputReader for parsing the structure of
> Vertex from the arbitrary input records. And, I think it's hard to say
> at this stage which is the fast and reliable project.
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Changguanghui <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi, all:
> >
> >     First, congratulations on the release of new version of HAMA!
> >     I have noticed HAMA for half year, but there are some questions
> about HAMA's direction. For example, could the HAMA's team have discussed
> another project which is called Giraph? and it focus on large-scale graph
> processing too.
> >     I just want to know What's difference of the two projects, and
> what's the HAMA's target in the future, and HAMA's advantage VS Giraph at
> present?
> >     Maybe, HAMA's team can give some advices to users like me, so we can
> make a decision to choose a project as our work platform.
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Chang
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>

Reply via email to