Actually, from real user applications, we rarely encounter master bottleneck since the main work is on segments.
The future plan is to have multiple masters. Cheers Lei On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:24 PM, mailing-list-recv < [email protected]> wrote: > From the architecture’s perspective, there seems only a single master ( > and a standby ) is able to receive incoming connections. > > So if the number of incoming applications keep increasing, a single master > could become the bottleneck. > > > Right now master seems responsible for handling both catalog and incoming > connections, is there any plan to separate the responsibilities to multiple > processes in the future? > > > Cheers >
