On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Daniel Einspanjer
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  We are specifically looking for the ability to create callbacks on put,
> increment, and delete for specific tables so we can implement the indexing
> solution.  This is actually advance preparation for Socorro 2.0 which won't
> be released until August or maybe September, so we have some dev time.
>
> My concern is that if we don't take advantage of your coprocessor work, we
> will end up needing to write our own callback code from scratch anyway, and
> that doesn't seem to be a better choice than helping you flesh out a solid
> use case for co-processors and implement it.
>

We'll soon (2-3 weeks) be releasing a HBase table-backed WAL/queue
implementation that binds HBase with SOLR for index updates in Lily, but is
designed not to be Lily-specific or -dependent. I don't know if this is of
any help for you, but it could be a robust way to asynchronously connect to
ES (or any other indexing service) as well.

More info at http://www.slideshare.net/outerthought/learning-lessons-4426942and
http://lilycms.org/lily/prerelease/architecture.html

HTH,

Steven.
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought                            Open Source Java & XML
stevenn at outerthought.org             Makers of the Daisy CMS

Reply via email to