are you proposing that internally it increases the replication factor of all the Hfiles for that table?
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:06 PM, john smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > > I am not sure whether this is feasible or not . > How about having a "Distributed Cache" for Hbase table, where we can just > specify the table name (or a subset of it's columns) and it gets copied to > all the nodes in the cluster during the mapreduce job. Does anything > similar > to this already exists in HBase . This feature can be useful if we want to > do any processing on very small tables. I tried searching for this but > didn't find anything relevant. > > Any ideas/comments ? > > Thanks > jS > -- Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
