Hi, Yep, it looks like it's a bug in our releasenote generation script. Sorry about that - the CHANGES.txt files are the definitive source for what's in there. We generate the release notes from there, but there's an indirection in between and it looks like a bug caused us to drop that JIRA from the notes.
To be clear, HDFS-630 is included in 0.20.1+169.89 (the latest CDH2, ie CDH2u1) as well as both betas of CDH3. -Todd On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>wrote: > Maybe their release notes are outdated or something, but it is there. > See http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/2/hadoop-0.20.1+169.89.CHANGES.txt > > J-D > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Ferdy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Cool thanks. These cloudera distributions certainly look promising. > > > > One final note, I could not find the HDFS-630 patch in the CDH2. I don't > > mean to nitpick but I'm still left wondering if I should include it or > not. > > > > Do you guys patch the CDH2 with HDFS-630 or what? Or would you say this > > patch is not so important after all? > > > > Ferdy > > > > This seems to be the newest CDH2 release: > > http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/2/hadoop-0.20.1+169.89.releasenotes.html > > > > Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > >> > >> Yes, and to deploy the cloudera release on your cluster :) > >> > >> J-D > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Ferdy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Allright so I will use a cloudera release. If I understand correctly, > >>> this > >>> includes simply replacing the Hadoop jar in the hbase/lib folder with > the > >>> cloudera hadoop core jar? > >>> > >>> Ferdy. > >>> > >>> On 07/01/2010 08:23 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Ferdy<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://hbase.apache.org/docs/r0.20.5/api/overview-summary.html#overview_description > >>>>> > >>>>> Here is states that it is recommended to use HDFS-630 patch for > Hadoop. > >>>>> So, > >>>>> why does the hbase 0.20.5 contains a stock hadoop 0.20.2 jar? (Hadoop > >>>>> 0.20.2 > >>>>> does not have HDFS-630 fixed). > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> What Ted said, and also we cannot ship with a patched jar simply > >>>> because it's not a client side-only change. If we did, it would mean > >>>> that our release of HBase wouldn't be compatible with any official > >>>> Apache Hadoop release. > >>>> > >>>> I agree with Todd, you can simply use CDH2. This is what we do on all > >>>> our clusters at StumbleUpon. > >>>> > >>>> J-D > >>>> > >>>> > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
