HBase is currently faster at writing than random reading, but long scans are faster than writing. Not sure exactly what that unnamed article is referring to.
Also, about using any other DBMS in conjunction with HBase, I would simply recommend using the right tool for the right job. J-D On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:26 AM, fitrah firdaus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear All, > > once, I read an article about Hbase, the article said that HBase good for > the process of reading but not for writing. > > So, if we have everyday applications should still use the RDBMS and the data > from the RDBMS batch into Hbase . Or is there another solution? > > Regards > > Firdaus
