Thanks Otis and everyone for their posts, has been a most useful read.

I feel hungry now thinking about shrimp, putting aside the oxymoron.

On 24/07/2010, at 3:39 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:

> Paul,
> 
> Threads on this topic from the past:
> 
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/tUsEQnb7Hn/hbase+in+a+box (last msg has example of 
> 1 
> box setup)
> 
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/c1ihA1PnAfQ/hbase+in+a+box
> 
> Look for the bonus jumbo shrimp analogy :)
> 
> Otis
> ----
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Paul Smith <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Thu, July 22, 2010 6:56:06 PM
>> Subject: Smallest production HBase cluster
>> 
>> anyone able to share their experience, thoughts on the 'smallest' production 
>>  
>> HBase cluster in operation?    Thinking there may be some point in the  # 
>> Nodes 
>> scale where one transitions from/to "that's silly" to "that's actually  more 
>> like it".
>> 
>> Anyone out there with a small HBase cluster in operation  with < 10 nodes 
>> able 
>> to share any information?
>> 
>> I notice on http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/PoweredBy there are some who 
>> have even  just a 3 node cluster, perhaps that's out of date, but curious to 
>> know from the  community on where people think 'the line' needs to be drawn 
>> on 
>> usage of  Hbase.
>> 
>> To take things to an extreme, is there anyone actually running a  _single_ 
>> HBase node... ? (one would hope that machine is actually designed to be  a 
>> bit 
>> more HA than normal) just to take advantage of a column-oriented  store?
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> Paul

Reply via email to