I think that this is stretching the usage of timestamps... but would you be able to write a small unit test that demonstrates it? Also did you try it on both 0.20 and 0.89?
Thx, J-D On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Evert Arckens <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a scenario of which I'm not sure if it is just another example of > issue HBASE-1485, or if it is another but related issue : > > Write 3 cells of a column, at timestamp 1, 2 and 3. > Then update the cells at timestamp 1 and 2 (more or less at the same > moment). > > Result is that the update of the cell at timestamp 1 gets lost. > If I would perform a major compaction between both updates, the update on > timestamp 1 wouldn't get lost. > > The reason I'm not sure if it is exactly the same issue as HBASE-1485 is > because that one just talks about updates on 1 cell, not on a combination > updates on 2 cells at different timestamps. > > Regards, > Evert Arckens. >
