That is correct. But we are confident with the new durability changes and
other things 0.90 will be safer and faster than 0.20.6.
On Oct 11, 2010 4:51 PM, "Sean Bigdatafun" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying this.
>
> But on the other hand, wow... that means that even I like the consistency
> enhancement in 0.90, I can not enjoy it if I have started using HBase 0.20
> on a production?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > What about region ID naming changes? I don't think the new region IDs
>> would
>> > work in 0.20.
>> >
>>
>> True.
>>
>> So no going back from a 0.89+ to a 0.20 because format of region names
>> in filesystem has changed.
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
