Ted , I appreciate your help!
I have read HBASE-2502 and mail of "hbase with multiple interfaces"

I rent the cluster to test HBase, so i can't modify the hardware configuration.
(Maybe others need the dual NICs)

Can I temporary modify some code to fix the issue?
(e.g.  Replace the process that look up IP address in DNS with some 
hardcode(fixed IP address) )
Anybody can give me some clues?


2010-11-04 



Pan.W 



发件人: Ted Yu 
发送时间: 2010-11-04  17:37:56 
收件人: user 
抄送: 
主题: Re: HBase failure causes dual NIC ? 
 
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2502
Deactivate one of the dual NICs.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Pan.W <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, HBaser
>
> I'm currently trying to run HBase,  but some errors occur.
>
> Running environment:
>   CentOS release 5.5
>   hadoop-0.20.2
>   hbase-0.20.6
>
> I use two machines to run hbase  (just for illustrate this issue).
>    Master is         : 192.168.22.18 /192.168.25.18
>    RegionServer is : 192.168.22.19 /192.168.25.19
>    In my cluster, every machine has dual NIC.  Maybe that's the problem, I
> guess...
>                                               ~~~~~~~
>
> In hbase-site.xml, list some configurations
>  <property>
>      <name>hbase.zookeeper.quorum</name>
>      <value>192.168.25.18, 192.168.25.19</value>
>      ...
>  </property>
>
>
> After run the start-hbase.sh, these relevant processes have been started!
> Run "hbase shell" to excute some commands:
> --------------------------------------------------------
> hbase(main):002:0> create "table1","cf1"
> NativeException: java.io.IOException: java.io.IOException:
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.createTable(HMaster.java:785)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.HMaster.createTable(HMaster.java:762)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>        at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.HBaseRPC$Server.call(HBaseRPC.java:657)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.HBaseServer$Handler.run(HBaseServer.java:915)
>
> hbase(main):013:0> list
> 10/11/04 15:43:28 INFO ipc.HbaseRPC: Server at /192.168.25.19:60020 could
> not be reached after 1 tries, giving up.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> And then execute "zk_dump", gets infomation as follows:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Version: 0.20.6, r965666, Mon Jul 19 16:54:48 PDT 2010
> hbase(main):001:0> zk_dump
> HBase tree in ZooKeeper is rooted at /hbase
>  Cluster up? true
>  In safe mode? false
>  Master address: 192.168.25.18:60000
>  Region server holding ROOT: 192.168.25.19:60020
>  Region servers:
>    - 192.168.22.19:60020
>  Quorum Server Statistics:
>    - 192.168.25.19:2181
>        Zookeeper version: 3.2.2-888565, built on 12/08/2009 21:51 GMT
>        Clients:
>         /192.168.25.18:53266[1](queued=0,recved=0,sent=0)
>        Latency min/avg/max: 0/0/0
>        Received: 0
>        Sent: 0
>        Outstanding: 0
>        Zxid: 0xc0000000d
>        Mode: leader
>        Node count: 11
>    - 192.168.25.18:2181
>        Zookeeper version: 3.2.2-888565, built on 12/08/2009 21:51 GMT
>        Clients:
>         /192.168.25.18:52198[1](queued=0,recved=0,sent=0)
>         /192.168.25.18:59354[1](queued=0,recved=4115,sent=0)
>         /192.168.25.19:41012[1](queued=0,recved=4106,sent=0)
>         /192.168.25.18:52195[1](queued=0,recved=10,sent=0)
>        Latency min/avg/max: 0/1/22
>        Received: 8251
>        Sent: 0
>        Outstanding: 0
>        Zxid: 0xc0000000d
>        Mode: follower
>        Node count: 11
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From the infomation returned by zk_dump, It's looks like the inconsistent
> IP address be used simultaneously.
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated!
>
>
> 2010-11-04
>
>
>
> Pan.W
>

Reply via email to