Gary (or anyone): Would you suggest I add to this, http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.90.0-candidate-1/docs/notsoquick.html#hadoop, our hadoop story for 0.90.0 going forward? Should I add note on hbase-3194?
Thanks, St.Ack On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Gary Helmling <[email protected]> wrote: > With HBASE-3194 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3194), I > believe HBase 0.90 should run on CDH3B3, as long as you do _not_ have > kerberos authentication setup for Hadoop > (hadoop.security.authentication=kerberos in core-site.xml). If you wish to > use kerberos authentication, you'll need to use CDH3B3 HBase. > > When fixing HBASE-3194, I only tested against Y! secure Hadoop (0.20.S), but > the same changes are in CDH3B3 Hadoop, so it should also work there. > > I think we should continue to accommodate both secure and insecure Hadoop > versions as much as we can, as people will likely want to run both for the > foreseeable future. > > Back to the original question, though, I think it's important to have an ASF > 0.20-append release to point users to as well. Are there any plans in > Hadoop-land for a 0.20-append release? > > --gh > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Just to make sure I'm clear, are you saying that HBase 0.90.0 is >> incompatible with CDH3b3 due to the security changes? >> >> We're just getting going with HBase and have been running 0.90.0rc1 on >> an un-patched version of Hadoop in dev. We were planning on upgrading >> to CDH3b3 to get the sync patches. >> >> thanks, >> Bill >> >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > The latest CDH3 beta includes security changes that currently HBase 0.90 >> and trunk don't incorporate. Of course we can help out with clear HBase >> issues, but for security exceptions or similar, what about that? Do we draw >> a line? Where? >> > >> > I've looked over the CDH3B3 installation documentation but have not >> installed it nor do presently use it. >> > >> > If we draw a line, then as an ASF community we should have a fallback >> option somewhere in ASF-land for the user to try. Vanilla Hadoop is not >> sufficient for HBase. Therefore, I propose we make a Hadoop 0.20-append >> tarball available. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > - Andy >> > >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. >> > - Piet Hein (via Tom White) >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >
