Yeah, they are so close. In some API redesigns they had same ancestor. If you make a patch that adds a Put constructor that takes a Result, we'll commit it. Seems like Put should take a row and a list of KVs minimally. St.Ack
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Vishal Kapoor <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it boils down to how can I make a Put out of a Result object > barring the rowid... > > thanks, > Vishal > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Vishal Kapoor > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I have table tableCombined : family 'live', family 'a', family 'b', family >> 'c' >> >> and also have almost static tables below >> tableA with family 'a' >> tableB with family 'b' >> tableC with family 'c' >> >> what is the best way to take a Get<rowid> of family 'a', from tableA and >> Put it to family 'a' of tableCombined while also writing data in family >> 'live'. >> I dont wish to iterate over all the columns of family 'a' on tableA and put >> one by one to family 'a' of tableCombined >> >> thanks, >> Vishal >> >
