Ah, sorry I should've read the usage. I ran it just now and the meta
data dump threw the same error "Not in GZIP format"

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> hfile metadata, the -m option?
> St.Ack
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Nanheng Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Sorry, by dumping the metadata did you mean running the same HFile
>> tool on ".region" file in each region?
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> If you dump the metadata, does it claim GZIP compressor?  If so, yeah,
>>> seems to be mismatch between what data is and what metadata is.
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Nanheng Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Awesome. I ran it on one of the hfiles and got this:
>>>> 11/01/28 09:57:15 INFO compress.CodecPool: Got brand-new decompressor
>>>> java.io.IOException: Not in GZIP format
>>>>        at 
>>>> java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.readHeader(GZIPInputStream.java:137)
>>>>        at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.<init>(GZIPInputStream.java:58)
>>>>        at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.<init>(GZIPInputStream.java:68)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec$GzipInputStream$ResetableGZIPInputStream.<init>(GzipCodec.java:92)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec$GzipInputStream.<init>(GzipCodec.java:101)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec.createInputStream(GzipCodec.java:169)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.hadoop.io.compress.GzipCodec.createInputStream(GzipCodec.java:179)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.Compression$Algorithm.createDecompressionStream(Compression.java:168)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFile$Reader.decompress(HFile.java:1013)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFile$Reader.readBlock(HFile.java:966)
>>>>        at 
>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFile$Reader$Scanner.seekTo(HFile.java:1291)
>>>>        at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFile.main(HFile.java:1740)
>>>>
>>>> So the problem could be that HFile writer is not writing properly
>>>> gzipped outputs?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> The section in 0.90 book on hfile tool should apply to 0.20.6:
>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/ch08s02.html#hfile_tool  It might help you w/
>>>>> your explorations.
>>>>>
>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Nanheng Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Stack,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Get doesn't work either. It was a fresh table created by
>>>>>> loadtable.rb. Finally, the uncompressed version had the same number of
>>>>>> regions (8 total). I totally understand you guys shouldn't be patching
>>>>>> the older version, upgrading for me is an option but will be pretty
>>>>>> painful. I wonder if I can figure something out by comparing the two
>>>>>> version's Hfile. Thanks again!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Nanheng Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In the compressed case, there are 8 regions and the region start/end
>>>>>>>> keys do line up. Which actually is confusing to me, how can hbase read
>>>>>>>> the files if they are compressed? does each hfile have some metadata
>>>>>>>> in it that has compression info?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You got it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway, the regions are the same
>>>>>>>> (numbers and boundaries are same) in both compressed and uncompressed
>>>>>>>> version. So what else should I look into to fix this? Thanks again!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can't scan. Can you Get from the table at all?  Try getting start
>>>>>>> key from a few of the regions you see in .META.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did this table preexist or was this a fresh creation?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When you created this table uncompressed, how many regions was it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about just running uncompressed while you are on 0.20.6?  We'd
>>>>>>> rather be fixing bugs in the new stuff, not the version that we are
>>>>>>> leaving behind?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to