BTW, which github version should I be cloning? Todd's or Kevin's?

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Friso van Vollenhoven <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, things changed a bit. The compressors now have a reinit(...) method
> that allows HBase to reuse the objects. I believe Hadoop still works
>
> Here's the version that should be good:
> https://github.com/toddlipcon/hadoop-lzo
>
> If you're already on a recent version, then something else might have gone
> wrong. I think the stack trace you posted indicates that there is an error
> earlier in the RS logs that shows what is wrong with the compressor.
> "Algorithm 'lzo' previously failed test". Look for when the test happened.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Friso
>
>
> On 28 mrt 2011, at 17:01, George P. Stathis wrote:
>
> Has anything changed with the way compression is handled in 0.90?
>
> I'm in the process of testing 0.90 CDH3B4 on my development machine (OS X).
> Up until 0.89 SNAPSHOTS, I have been able to re-use the same lzo JAR and
> native libs that I compiled back in 0.20.x. With this latest upgrade, I now
> see this in the region server logs:
>
> 2011-03-28 10:54:51,787 ERROR
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler: Failed open
> of region=monitors,,1287788998658.a6c3f7f6a927fda960a856c274b470c0.
> java.io.IOException: Compression algorithm 'lzo' previously failed test.
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CompressionTest.testCompression(CompressionTest.java:77)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.checkCompressionCodecs(HRegion.java:2555)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:2544)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.openHRegion(HRegion.java:2532)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler.openRegion(OpenRegionHandler.java:262)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.handler.OpenRegionHandler.process(OpenRegionHandler.java:94)
> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.executor.EventHandler.run(EventHandler.java:151)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
>
> Just want to make sure I'm not missing something before I start
> re-compiling
> those libs.
>
> -GS
>
>

Reply via email to