Want to make an issue to change it Joe? (As Ryan says, no justification that I remember other than that is how its always been).
St.Ack On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Joe Pallas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Ryan Rawson wrote: > >> because it always has been? I think the original BT paper probably >> had the number '3' in there somewhere... >> >> But yes, not too big, not too small. There probably isnt a reasonable >> setting here, I'm guessing 1 isnt quite right either. > > Why? Why shouldn't 1 be the default? If you don't have an explicit use case > for more than one version, which I would wager many people don't, what is the > point of it? > > joe > > PS Yes, the Google paper has the number 3 in it somewhere: in the > web-crawling example. Since it was just one example, it doesn't make a very > good basis for a system-wide default. > >
