On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Venkatesh <vramanatha...@aol.com> wrote: > > I was hoping that too.. > I don't have scripts to generate # requests from shell..I will try that.. >
Did you try it? Above you seem to say that a simple put of < 100 bytes takes 2 seconds where in 0.20.6 it took < 10 milliseconds. A put from shell of 100 bytes is easy enough to do. hbase> put 'YOUR_TABLE', 'SOME_ROW', 'SOME_COLUMN', 'SOME_STRING_OF_100_BYTES' The shell will print out rough numbers on how long it takes to do the put (from ruby). > I did n't pre-create regions in 0.20.6 & it handled fine the same load.. > I'll try performance in 0.90.2 by precreating regions.. > > Would sharing a single HBaseConfiguration object for all threads hurt > performance? > I'd doubt that this is the issue. It should help usually. St.Ack
