Thanks Andy. We might move to 0.90.3 soon. * *
*Abhijit Pol | Senior Rocket Scientist | [email protected] | 408.892.3377 p |* On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Stack, > > Aside from the other ideas you mention, this could also be HBASE-3855 if a > lot of values are up in memstore? > > By the way, I patched our 0.90-ish in house HBase with 3855 with no > untoward affects and noticeable improvement under profiling. Why not commit > it to 0.90 as well? > > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > > > --- On Wed, 6/8/11, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Stack <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: increasing hbase get latencies > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011, 11:31 PM > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 PM, > > Abhijit Pol <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Recently we observed that our "get" latencies keep increasing > > > over the period (and eventually flatten out at higher value) > > > and if we restart hbase server, latencies go back to good > > > state (low values) and start increasing again. > >
