How are index updates handled, since they lead to performance degradation? Mark
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Geoff Hendrey <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks for the pointer. If I understand correctly, the index > partitioning strategy would simply mirror the region-server partitioning > strategy. That is to say, each region would have a lucene index stored > in HDFS to provide secondary indexing. When a user searches for "Fat > Cat", then every region would receive the query, and execute the search > and the results of this "query fanout" would then be merged together. Is > that roughly the idea? Individual lucene indexes would remain reasonably > sized because each index indexes only the data of a single region. > Correct? > > This is really interesting stuff. Thanks for your help in understanding > it. > > -geoff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Helmling [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 11:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: hbase + lucene? > > I wasn't at the day-after presentation, but I believe these are the > slides? > > https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B2c-F > WyLSJBCN2E5MTdmOGMtY2U5NS00NmEwLWE2NmItZTYxOTI0MTJmMzU5&hl=en_US > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Here is the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3529 > > > > And let me chase Jason to post his slides. > > > > St.Ack > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Geoff Hendrey <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Hi - > > > > > > > > > > > > At hadoop summit it was mentioned that there was a planning meeting > for > > > a project regarding hbase and lucene. I believe the meeting was > > > scheduled for the day after the summit. I wasn't able to attend, but > I > > > would like to keep abreast of what's going on in this regard. Anyone > > > know anything about this? > > > > > > > > > > > > -geoff > > > > > > > > >
