Then how to explain this unpredictable 629 seconds with completely underloaded server: Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0004060 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 629.5515080 seconds (!) Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0006960 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0001590 seconds Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0003250 seconds
And this is still unclear too: [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=158.65 secs] What is "real" in EC2 terms? Broken router?! On 11-08-29 2:39 PM, "Jean-Daniel Cryans" <[email protected]> wrote: >Looks normal to me considering the platform. It's not so much a GC as >the machine was unavailable for more than 2 minutes since there's no >user or sys CPU involved. > >J-D > >On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Fuad Efendi <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> How to explain that: >> >> 2011-08-08T19:02:24.947+0000: 14564.360: [GC 14564.360: [ParNew: >> 52681K->6528K(59008K), 158.6620830 secs] 2285054K->2240073K(4187776K) >> icms_dc=0 , 158.6622690 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=158.65 >>secs] >> Total time for which application threads were stopped: 158.6632510 >>seconds >> >> >> QUESTION: How can? Zero, Zero, and real=158 seconds?!! >> >> >> However, in most cases (99.99%) I have >> 2011-08-08T18:55:20.811+0000: 14140.225: [GC 14140.225: [ParNew: >> 54381K->2110K(59008K), 0.0286450 secs] 1651815K->1599544K(4187776K) >> icms_dc=0 , 0.0287720 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.03 secs] >> Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0296330 seconds >> 2011-08-08T18:55:21.181+0000: 14140.594: [GC 14140.594: [ParNew: >> 54588K->3056K(59008K), 0.0388800 secs] 1652022K->1600490K(4187776K) >> icms_dc=0 , 0.0390230 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.04 secs] >> Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0398510 seconds >> 2011-08-08T18:55:21.527+0000: 14140.940: [GC 14140.940: [ParNew: >> 55536K->4812K(59008K), 0.0326740 secs] 1652970K->1602247K(4187776K) >> icms_dc=0 , 0.0328500 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.04 secs] >> Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0338200 seconds >> 2011-08-08T18:55:21.868+0000: 14141.281: [GC 14141.281: [ParNew: >> 57258K->5232K(59008K), 0.0091650 secs] 1654693K->1604268K(4187776K) >> icms_dc=0 , 0.0093210 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.01 secs] >> Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0101470 seconds >> 2011-08-08T18:55:22.179+0000: 14141.592: [GC 14141.592: [ParNew: >> 57712K->6521K(59008K), 0.0307120 secs] 1656748K->1608576K(4187776K) >> icms_dc=0 , 0.0308700 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.03 secs] >> Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0318530 seconds >> 2011-08-08T18:55:22.603+0000: 14142.016: [GC 14142.016: [ParNew: >> 59001K->364K(59008K), 0.0471390 secs] 1661056K->1608313K(4187776K) >>icms_dc=0 >> , 0.0472720 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.05 secs] >> Total time for which application threads were stopped: 0.0480990 seconds >> 2011-08-08T18:55:22.994+0000: 14142.407: [GC 14142.407: [ParNew: >> 52844K->2014K(59008K), 0.0257020 secs] 1660793K->1609963K(4187776K) >> icms_dc=0 , 0.0258530 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.03 secs] >> >> >> I believe we are indeed using "virtualization"Š $0.68/hour, three nodes >> 7 GB of memory >> 20 EC2 Compute Units (8 virtual cores with 2.5 EC2 Compute Units each) >> 1690 GB of instance storage >> 64-bit platform >> I/O Performance: High >> API name: c1.xlarge >> >> >> I am absolutely sure this is unpredictable and cause of a problem is >>sharing >> the same hardware with 3-4 other users. Box such as cc1.4xlarge is >>shared >> with 3 other users to make 3 instances of c1.xlarge, and no swap file >>(but >> "swap caching"?) >> 23 GB of memory >> 33.5 EC2 Compute Units (2 x Intel Xeon X5570, quad-core ³Nehalem² >> architecture) >> 1690 GB of instance storage >> 64-bit platform >> I/O Performance: Very High (10 Gigabit Ethernet) >> API name: cc1.4xlarge >> >> >> >> Any EC2 bad/good experience to share? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> -- >> Fuad Efendi >> http://www.tokenizer.ca >> >> >> >> >> >>
