Hi Andy,

Thanks for your reply. I had not realised there is a Hadoop 1.0. Can you tell 
me if there is a release for it or do I have to build my own from the source? 

Royston


On 13 Dec 2011, at 16:45, Andrew Purtell wrote:

>> Does hbase-0.92.0-candidate-0 run with hadoop 0.20.2?
> 
> This is not recommended or supported, due to lack of append support in HDFS 
> in that release. Consider Hadoop 1.0 or CDH3.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
>    - Andy
> 
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via 
> Tom White)
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Royston Sellman <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: 
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:02 AM
>> Subject: Re: hbase coprocessor availability issue in 0.90.4
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Does hbase-0.92.0-candidate-0 run with hadoop 0.20.2?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Royston
>> 
>> 
>> On 13 Dec 2011, at 09:39, Harsh J wrote:
>> 
>>> Akhtar,
>>> 
>>> You may find them under 
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-0/
>>> 
>>> On 13-Dec-2011, at 3:04 PM, Akhtar Muhammad Din wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> From where I can download release candidate for 0.92, I can only find
>>>> 0.90.4 version available as the latest release
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Andrew Purtell 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Arsalan,
>>>>> 
>>>>> For the Coprocessor feature, you will need to upgrade to the 0.92 
>> release
>>>>> or later.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>>   - Andy
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 13, 2011, at 12:04 AM, Arsalan Bilal 
>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am currently using habse 0.90.4.
>>>>>> I want to implement Coprocessors. I know that coprocessors were 
>> part of
>>>>>> 0.92 and in hbase book, it is clearly mention that Coprocessors 
>> are
>>>>>> currently on TRUNK.
>>>>>> Is there any way to implement coprocessors in 0.90.4 or will it 
>> be
>>>>>> available in next release?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Arsalan Bilal
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Regards
>>>> Akhtar Muhammad Din
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to