Thanks for reply Todd. Great news, I'll, definitely, prefer hdfs if HA already available for development.
I see, that most issues addressed to HA branch. What version this branch is applied to? 0.22 or i should build hadoop from sources? 20 декабря 2011 г. 11:46 пользователь Todd Lipcon <[email protected]>написал: > Hi Andrey, > > I don't think anyone has ever run Ceph in a production use case, much > less run it in a production use case with HBase. > > The SPOF problem is currently being addressed and will be available > for production use by the middle of next calendar year. It will be > available for preview/beta usage in Q1 (it's already working in > development setups - feel free to follow HDFS-1623 for details) > > I think you're way better off waiting for the HA NameNode support in > HDFS than going with an unproven FS like Ceph. Ceph certainly has > promise and is a nice design, but it hasn't had the years of pounding > that HDFS has. > > -Todd > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Andrey Stepachev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > I have requirements to use hbase in several datacenters. > > But HDFS has as SPOF, so we can't use it. > > I plan to use ceph as the file system for hbase. > > > > In general, interested in issues of: > > a) use the hadoop + сeph in the production environment > > b) using hbase + ceph in the production environment > > > > In particular: > > Ceph Wiki states that the integration of hadoop/ceph has the problem in > the > > form of modification dates of the files. > > Does hbase uses modification times for some critical tasks? > > > > -- > > Andrey. > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Андрей.
