Can you tell me how many regions each region server hosts ?

In 0.90.4 there is this parameter:
    <name>hbase.hregion.memstore.mslab.enabled</name>
    <value>true</value>
mslab tends to consume heap if region count is high.

Cheers

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Seraph Imalia <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> After updating from 0.20.6 to 0.90.4, we have been having serious RAM
> issues.  I had hbase-env.sh set to use 3 Gigs of RAM with 0.20.6 but with
> 0.90.4 even 4.5 Gigs seems not enough.  It does not matter how much load
> the hbase services are under, it just crashes after 24-48 hours.  The only
> difference the load makes is how quickly the services crash.  Even over
> this holiday season with our lowest load of the year, it crashes just after
> 36 hours of being started.  To fix it, I have to run the stop-hbase.sh
> command, wait a while and kill -9 any hbase processes that have stopped
> outputting logs or stopped responding, and then run start-hbase.sh again.
>
> Attached are my logs from the latest "start-to-crash".  There are 3
> servers and hbase is being used for storing URL's - 7 client servers
> connect to hbase and perform URL Lookups at about 40 requests per second
> (this is the low load over this holiday season).  If the URL does not
> exist, it gets added.  The Key on the HTable is the URL and there are a few
> fields stored against it - e.g. DateDiscovered, Host, Script, QueryString,
> etc.
>
> Each server has a hadoop datanode and an hbase regionserver and 1 of the
> servers additionally has the namenode, master and zookeeper.  On first
> start, each regionserver uses 2 Gigs (usedHeap) and as soon as I restart
> the clients, the usedHeap slowly climes until it reaches the maxHeap and
> shortly after that, the regionservers start crashing - sometimes they
> actually shutdown gracefully by themselves.
>
> Originally, we had hbase.regionserver.handler.count set to 100 and I have
> now removed that to leave it as default which has not helped.
>
> We have not made any changes to the clients and we have a mirrored
> instance of this in our UK Data Centre which is still running 0.20.6 and
> servicing 10 clients currently at over 300 requests per second (again low
> load over the holidays) and it is 100% stable.
>
> What do I do now? - your website says I cannot downgrade?
>
> Please help
>
> Regards,
> Seraph
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to