On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> 2) With that same randomWrite command line above, I would expect a resulting >> table with 10 * (1024 * 1024) rows (so 10485700 = roughly 10M rows). >> Instead what I'm seeing is that the randomWrite job reports writing that >> many rows (exactly) but running rowcounter against the table reveals only >> 6549899 rows. A second attempt to build the table produces slightly >> different results (e.g. 6627689). I see a similar discrepancy when using 50 >> instead of 10 clients (~35% smaller than expected). Key collision could >> explain it, but it seems pretty unlikely (given I only need e.g. 10M keys >> from a potential 2B). >> >
I just tried it here and got similar result. I wonder if its the randomWrite? What if you do sequentialWrite, do you get our 10M? I'll try it here again later with sequentialWrite. St.Ack
