On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:32 PM, pig user <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like HBASE-2909, but it was fixed in 0.90.0. >
Do you have HBASE-2909 in your hbase and you are still seeing the issue? Sounds like it wasn't fixed then? St.Ack
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:32 PM, pig user <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like HBASE-2909, but it was fixed in 0.90.0. >
Do you have HBASE-2909 in your hbase and you are still seeing the issue? Sounds like it wasn't fixed then? St.Ack