On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Juhani Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > Since we haven't heard anything on expected throughput we're downgrading our > hdfs back to 0.20.2, I'd be curious to hear how other people do with 0.23 > and the throughput they're getting. >
We don't have much experience running on 0.23, I think its fair to say. It works but not much more than that can be said. The sync code path is different in 0.23 than in 0.20.2 and has had less scrutiny (When you say 0.20.2, you mean CDH? Which CDH?). I think its good to go back. Regards numbers, its hard to compare workloads but if it helps, looking at our frontend now, its relatively idle doing between 100-500k hits on 30 machines that are less than yours, less memory, 10k regions, with a workload that is mostly increments (read-mostly-from-block-cache/modify/write). Yes, the errors are relatively few but poke around more if you can. Why are there errors at all? St.Ack
