Anil: I think the performance was related to your custom filter. Please tell us more about the filter next time.
Thanks On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:31 PM, anil gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > HI Stack, > > I'll look into Gary Helming post and try to do profiling of coprocessor and > share the results. > > Thanks, > Anil Gupta > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:02 PM, anil gupta <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I loaded around 70 thousand 1-2KB records in HBase. For scans, with my > > > custom filter i am able to get 97 rows in 500 milliseconds and for > doing > > > sum, max, min(in built aggregations of HBase) on the same custom filter > > its > > > taking 11000 milliseconds. Does this mean that coprocessors aggregation > > is > > > supposed to be around ~20x slower than scans? Am i missing any trick > over > > > here? > > > > > > > That seems like a high tax to pay for running CPs. Can you dig in on > > where the time is being spent? (See another recent note on this list > > or on dev where Gary Helmling talks about how he did basic profiling > > of CPs). > > St.Ack > > > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Anil Gupta >
