Hi

I have vanilla CDH4 setup haven't changed any config.

I don't think that regionserver is getting hotspotted, because I'm using
auto-incremented and then reversed ids so it should be evenly distributed
across the regionservers.

Regards,
Giorgi

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan <
[email protected]> wrote:

> And is your regionserver getting hotspotted? Like all your requests are
> targeted to one particular RegionServer or to one particular region alone?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Ram
>
>
>
> From: Giorgi Jvaridze [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Decreasing write speed over time
>
>
>
> Hi thanks for answer,
>
>
>
> I've attached image of the chart.
>
> Write performance is going down by the time. and never goes up.
>
> As you can see on chart there are spikes but beside that generally write
> performance goes down over time.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Giorgi
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Anoop Sam John <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>  Sorry I was not able to access your chart of put perf. Is it like the
> performance gradually coming down and at some point again getting better
> all of a sudden?  [some spikes in graph]
> It may be because of HBASE-3484
>
> You can check the memstore size that u have given and see whether the
> spikes coming at the memstore flush time and then again perf going down
> gradually...
>
> -Anoop-
> __________
> From: Giorgi Jvaridze [[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 7:28 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Decreasing write speed over time
>
>
> Hello list,
>
> I have Hbase (CDH4) setup of a master and 4 region servers (8 core 2.0GHz,
> 6GB of RAM and 6 100GB disks per data node). All of them are virtual
> machines.
>
> I'm writing into a table using single thread w/ auto flush off.
> Ids are increased by one and then reversed. Data is a string with average
> length 150 chars.
>
> I'm measuring time needed for writing one million rows. At first I got
> quite good results, it could write about 40-50K rows in a second but after
> time this speed decreased.
> I have a chart showing how It has been decreased by the time and data got
> bigger. At the end of chart it's about 2 billion rows inserted.
>
> http://i.minus.com/iRFtEoVJVsFso.png
>
> Is this expected behavior for this kind of setup or something could went
> wrong and I should check it up?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Giorgi
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to