On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I better to run it on 1? Or on 3? I just want to do some testing > for now. but for ZK, can I keep it in only one server for now? Or it will be > more efficient if Iconfigure it on 3?
FWIW your system will be as available is PC1 is, so just put 1 ZK on that node. ZK is not on the read path so whether you have 1 or 10 it won't change anything. > But I have issues with the performances. It's taking 20 > seconds to do 1000 gets with the actual configuration... I'm tracking > the issues. I think the network is one so I will address it this week, > Network is always good to check, it's all fun and games until an interface negotiates 100Mb. 50ms per get sounds a bit extreme. > > Thanks, > > JM > > 2012/6/26, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>: >> A quorum with 2 members is worse than 1 so don't put a ZK on PC2, the >> exception you are seeing is that ZK is trying to get a quorum on with >> 1 machine but that doesn't make sense so instead it should revert to a >> standalone server and still work. >> >> J-D
