On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Norbert Burger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Srinivas Mupparapu > <[email protected]> wrote: >> It scans .META. table just like any other table. I just tested it and it >> produced the expected output. > > I'm pretty sure Srinivas scanned .META. in his own environment, not mine. ;-) > >> On Sep 10, 2012 12:19 PM, "Stack" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What happens if you scan .META. in shell? >>> >>> hbase> scan ".META." >>> >>> Does it all show? > > Thanks, Stack. Strangely, all regions do show up in .META. The table > in question has 256 regions, and all are listed as rowkeys in .META. > Perhaps there's a column missing from region definitions which is > preventing the UI from rendering the regions? I'll dig through the > code, but are there specific columns known to be expected the UI? > > Fwiw, this particular table was the result of a rename_table.rb > attempt that didn't go as smoothly as I would've liked. I had to dig > through .META. and resolve inconsistencies. >
What version of hbase? Can you disable and reenable the table? When you scan the table in shell, do you see 'status=offline'. St.Ack
