Thanks Andrew for the supplement, this really helps me understand why 3.4.5 is released even if it only includes two bug fixes.
On 30 November 2012 04:45, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > 3.4.4 had a particularly unfortunate bug (ZOOKEEPER-1550). Users not > running Oracle JDK (e.g. OpenJDK or IBM JDK or JDK 7) could easly fail to > connect to a ZooKeeper instance NOT set up for SASL/secure communication. > This is what 3.4.5 fixes, primarily. The version of ZK you use certainly > matters, so far as HBase users should avoid 3.4.4. > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Does the ZK version really matter? > > > > I'm running with 3.4.3 and it seems to be working fine. > > > > Should I think about moving to 3.4.5? Is there any advantage to that? > > (Performances, issues, etc.) > > > > 2012/11/29, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]>: > > > It's a regression in 3.4.4 (HBASE-6917), fixed in 3.4.5 (HBASE-7159) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Yu Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Dear all, > > >> > > >> I checked the Zookeeper site and found the latest stable release is > > >> 3.4.5, > > >> and although there's only 2 bug fixes from zk 3.4.4 to 3.4.5, there're > > >> more > > >> than 50 bug fixes from 3.4.3 to 3.4.4, so I'm wondering why hbase > trunk > > >> still using zk 3.4.3. Is there any special consideration not to > upgrade? > > >> Looking forward to your reply, and thanks in advance! > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best Regards, > > >> Li Yu > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > -- Best Regards, Li Yu
