Hi Ram,

Yes BlockCache is on but there is another in memory column which might be
preempting the stuff from block cache. So, we might be hitting more disk
seeks - I see that you have seen this trace before on HBASE 5898 - did that
issue resolve things for you ?

Thanks
Varun

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:04 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Is block cache ON?  Check out HBASe-5898?
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Anoop Sam John <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > >is the META table cached just like other tables
> > Yes Varun I think so.
> >
> > -Anoop-
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Varun Sharma [[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 6:10 AM
> > To: [email protected]; lars hofhansl
> > Subject: Re: .META. region server DDOSed by too many clients
> >
> > We only see this on the .META. region not otherwise...
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Varun Sharma <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I see but is this pointing to the fact that we are heading to disk for
> > > scanning META - if yes, that would be pretty bad, no ? Currently I am
> > > trying to see if the freeze coincides with Block Cache being full (we
> > have
> > > an inmemory column) - is the META table cached just like other tables ?
> > >
> > > Varun
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:20 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Looks like you're running into HBASE-5898.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: Varun Sharma <[email protected]>
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Cc:
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 3:51 PM
> > >> Subject: .META. region server DDOSed by too many clients
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I am running hbase 0.94.0 and I have a significant write load being
> put
> > on
> > >> a table with 98 regions on a 15 node cluster - also this write load
> > comes
> > >> from a very large number of clients (~ 1000). I am running with 10
> > >> priority
> > >> IPC handlers and 200 IPC handlers. It seems the region server holding
> > >> .META
> > >> is DDOSed. All the 200 handlers are busy serving the .META. region and
> > >> they
> > >> are all locked onto on object. The Jstack is here for the regoin
> server
> > >>
> > >> "IPC Server handler 182 on 60020" daemon prio=10
> tid=0x00007f329872c800
> > >> nid=0x4401 waiting on condition [0x00007f328807f000]
> > >>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
> > >>         at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> > >>         - parking to wait for  <0x0000000542d72e30> (a
> > >> java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync)
> > >>         at
> > >> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:838)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireQueued(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:871)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquire(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1201)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync.lock(ReentrantLock.java:214)
> > >>         at
> > >> java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.lock(ReentrantLock.java:290)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$Segment.put(ConcurrentHashMap.java:445)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.putIfAbsent(ConcurrentHashMap.java:925)
> > >>         at
> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.IdLock.getLockEntry(IdLock.java:71)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV2.readBlock(HFileReaderV2.java:290)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlockIndex$BlockIndexReader.seekToDataBlock(HFileBlockIndex.java:213)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV2$AbstractScannerV2.seekTo(HFileReaderV2.java:455)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileReaderV2$AbstractScannerV2.reseekTo(HFileReaderV2.java:493)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.reseekAtOrAfter(StoreFileScanner.java:242)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.reseek(StoreFileScanner.java:167)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.NonLazyKeyValueScanner.doRealSeek(NonLazyKeyValueScanner.java:54)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.KeyValueHeap.generalizedSeek(KeyValueHeap.java:299)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.KeyValueHeap.reseek(KeyValueHeap.java:244)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner.reseek(StoreScanner.java:521)
> > >>         - locked <0x000000063b4965d0> (a
> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner.next(StoreScanner.java:402)
> > >>         - locked <0x000000063b4965d0> (a
> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreScanner)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.KeyValueHeap.next(KeyValueHeap.java:127)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.nextInternal(HRegion.java:3354)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.next(HRegion.java:3310)
> > >>         - locked <0x0000000523c211e0> (a
> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl.next(HRegion.java:3327)
> > >>         - locked <0x0000000523c211e0> (a
> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$RegionScannerImpl)
> > >>         at
> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.get(HRegion.java:4066)
> > >>         at
> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.get(HRegion.java:4039)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionServer.get(HRegionServer.java:1941)
> > >>
> > >> The client side trace shows that we are looking for META region.
> > >>
> > >> thrift-worker-3499" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007f789dd98800 nid=0xb52
> > >> waiting
> > >> for monitor entry [0x00007f778672d000]
> > >>    java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.locateRegionInMeta(HConnectionManager.java:943)
> > >>         - waiting to lock <0x0000000707978298> (a java.lang.Object)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.locateRegion(HConnectionManager.java:836)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.processBatchCallback(HConnectionManager.java:1482)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.processBatch(HConnectionManager.java:1367)
> > >>         at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HTable.batch(HTable.java:729)
> > >>         - locked <0x000000070821d5a0> (a
> > >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HTable)
> > >>         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HTable.get(HTable.java:698)
> > >>         at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HTablePool$PooledHTable.get(HTablePool.java:371)
> > >>
> > >> On the RS page, I see 68 million read requests for the META region
> while
> > >> for the other 98 regions - we have done like 20 million write requests
> > in
> > >> total - regions have not moved around at all and no crashes have
> > happened.
> > >> Why do we have such an incredible number of scans over META and is
> there
> > >> something I can do about this issue ?
> > >>
> > >> Varun
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to