Hi Tariq,
Thanks for the update, I'll try it. Btw , will put operation makes any
performance difference using htable or htablepool ?
> Use "HTbalePool" instead and see if it gives you better performance.
> Creating an HTable instance is a fairly expensive operation that takes a
> few seconds to complete.
>
> Warm Regards,
> Tariq
> https://mtariq.jux.com/
> cloudfront.blogspot.com
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Lsshiu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Tariq,
>> Thanks for the tip, but I only opened a few htable instances. The
>> total region numbers were quite many (more than 70000 ) though.
>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> Do you have too many Htable instances opened simultaneously?It's not
>>> advisable to do so.
>>>
>>> Warm Regards,
>>> Tariq
>>> https://mtariq.jux.com/
>>> cloudfront.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Lsshiu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> In my 0.90.6 hbase environment , each time when I try "new htable, " it
>>>> was slow. "Put " also slow too. Can I turn on some kind of trace to know
>>>> the exact time spent in each detail function call? Thanks.
>>
