We will do some testing along with code reviews. You can watch HBASE-7667 for further development.
You're right in that its goal is not to get rid of compaction. Thanks On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > HBASE-7667 sounds like an improvement whose details I don't fully > understand, but not quite the same as compaction elimination. And I don't > understand HBASE-7667 enough to have the feeling for how much less painful > compactions would become after this. Any way to quantify that? > > Thanks, > Otis > -- > HBASE Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Take a look at HBASE-7667 Support stripe compaction > > > > Cheers > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > It's kind of funny, we run SPM, which includes SPM for HBase > (performance > > > monitoring service/tool for HBase essentially) and we currently store > all > > > performance metrics in HBase. > > > > > > I see a ton of HBase development activity, which is great, but it just > > > occurred to me that I don't think I recall seeing anything about > getting > > > rid of compactions. Yet, compactions are one thing that I know hurt us > > the > > > most and is one thing that MapR somehow got rid of in their > > implementation. > > > > > > Have there been any discussions,attempts, or thoughts about finding a > way > > > to avoid compactions? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Otis > > > -- > > > HBASE Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > > > > > >
