My understanding is that the row key would start with +++++ for instance. On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Mohit, > > I see nothing wrong with the results below. What would I have expected? > > JM > > 2013/3/28 Mohit Anchlia <[email protected]>: > > I am running 92.1 version and this is what happens. > > > > > > hbase(main):003:0> scan 'SESSIONID_TIMELINE', {LIMIT => 1, STARTROW => > > 'sdw0'} > > ROW COLUMN+CELL > > s\xC1\xEAR\xDF\xEA&\x89\x91\xFF\x1A^\xB6d\xF0\xEC\x > > column=SID_T_MTX:\x00\x00Rc, timestamp=1363056261106, > > value=PAGE\x09\x091363056252990\x09\x09/ > > 7F\xFF\xFE\xC2\xA3\x84Z\x7F > > > > 1 row(s) in 0.0450 seconds > > hbase(main):004:0> scan 'SESSIONID_TIMELINE', {LIMIT => 1, STARTROW => > > '------'} > > ROW COLUMN+CELL > > -\xA1\xAF>r\xBD\xE2L\x00\xCD*\xD7\xE8\xD6\x1Dk\x7F\ > > column=SID_T_MTX:\x00\x00hF, timestamp=1363384706714, > > value=PAGE\x09239923973\x091363384698919\x09/ > > xFF\xFE\xC2\x8F\xF0\xC1\xBF > > row(s) in 0.0500 seconds > > hbase(main):005:0> scan 'SESSIONID_TIMELINE', {LIMIT => 1, STARTROW => > > '++++'} > > ROW COLUMN+CELL > > +9hC\xFC\x82s\xABL3\xB3B\xC0\xF9\x87\x03\x7F\xFF\xF > > column=SID_T_MTX:\x00\x00<2, timestamp=1364404155426, > > value=PAGE\x09\x091364404145275\x09 \x09/ > > E\xC2S-\x08\x1F > > 1 row(s) in 0.0640 seconds > > hbase(main):006:0> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:23 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Same question, same time :) > >> > >> Regards > >> Ram > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:53 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Could you give us some more insights on this? > >> > So you mean when you set the row key as 'azzzaaa', though this row > does > >> > not exist, the scanner returns some other row? Or it is giving you a > row > >> > that does not exist? > >> > > >> > Or you mean it is doing a full table scan? > >> > > >> > Which version of HBase and what type of filters are you using? > >> > Regards > >> > Ram > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Mohit Anchlia < > [email protected] > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> I have key in the form of "hashedid + timestamp" but when I run scan > I > >> get > >> >> rows for almost every value. For instance if I run scan for 'azzzaaa' > >> that > >> >> doesn't even exist even then I get the results. > >> >> > >> >> Could someone help me understand what might be going on here? > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >
