Not off hand. But its something that I think I could cobble up over the next couple of days if my wife runs out of projects for me to do around the house. ;-)
On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Michael Segel > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Really a bad title for the section. >> >> Schema Smackdown? Really? >> >> 6.10.1 isn't really valid is it? Rows version versions? >> IMHO it should be Columns versus versions. (Do you put a timestamp in the >> column qualifier name versus having an enormous number of versions allowed?) >> >> There's more, but I tend to be very conservative to my approach to schema >> design, so what do I know? ;-) >> > > Do you have a patch for the refguide Michael to improve the section? > Thanks, > St.Ack
