Try turning off
http://hbase.apache.org/apidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.html#setRegionCachePrefetch(byte[],
boolean)

St.Ack


On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Varun Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:

> JD, its a big problem. The region server holding .META has 2X the network
> traffic and 2X the cpu load, I can easily spot the region server holding
> .META. by just looking at the ganglia graphs of the region servers side by
> side - I don't need to go the master console. So we can't scale up the
> cluster or add more load since its bottlenecked on this one region server.
>
> Thanks Nicholas for the pointer, its seems quite probable that this is the
> issue - it was fixed with 0.94.8 so we don't have it. I will give it a
> shot.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > It could be HBASE-6870?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Can you tell who's doing it? You could enable IPC debug for a few secs
> > > to see who's coming in with scans.
> > >
> > > You could also try to disable pre-fetching, set
> > > hbase.client.prefetch.limit to 0
> > >
> > > Also, is it even causing a problem or you're just worried it might
> > > since it doesn't look "normal"?
> > >
> > > J-D
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Varun Sharma <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > We are seeing an issue with hbase 0.94.3 on CDH 4.2.0 with excessive
> > > .META.
> > > > reads...
> > > >
> > > > In the steady state where there are no client crashes and there are
> no
> > > > region server crashes/region movement, the server holding .META. is
> > > serving
> > > > an incredibly large # of read requests on the .META. table.
> > > >
> > > > From my understanding, in the steady state, region locations should
> be
> > > > indefinitely cached in the client. The client is running a work load
> of
> > > > multiput(s), puts, gets and coprocessor calls.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Varun
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to