Thanks Ted. Will take a look at it.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please see also 'Replication Metrics' at the bottom of > http://hbase.apache.org/replication.html > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:23 PM, hdev ml <hde...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Demai. Need to find out how to access HBase metrics. > > > > But thanks for your insights. > > Harshad > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Demai Ni <nid...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > 1) you can use replication metrics info such as:ageOfLastShippedOp, > > > timeStampsOfLastShippedOp, sizeOfLogQueue ageOfLastAppliedOp, and > > > timeStampsOfLastAppliedOp to figure out the lag. > > > 2) with my best knowledge, the replication won't be together with > > snapshot. > > > That is the peers won't know there is a restore occurred on primary. > So a > > > user must take care it manually. the VerifyReplication tool may be > > > helpful to identify which data (boundary by timestamps) is mismatch, so > > the > > > copyTable doesn't have to copy the whole table > > > > > > Demai > > > > > > Demai > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:07 PM, hdev ml <hde...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I have a couple of questions for HBase. > > > > > > > > 1. Is there any way to find out by how much time the replication is > > > lagging > > > > on the peer cluster or even primary cluster is ok. > > > > 2. Say replication is going on for some time for a table and then you > > > > restore a snapshot on the Primary. Would replication catch up with > the > > > > restore snapshot? Or do I have to treat that as replicating from > > scratch, > > > > meaning > > > > > > > > 1. disable peer > > > > 2. restore snapshot on primary > > > > 3. copyTable upto disable timestamp > > > > 4. enable peer > > > > > > > > > > > > Any help is appreciated. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Harshad > > > > > > > > > >