@Ted Yu:
Yep, nevertheless thanks a lot!

Am 18.12.2013 um 10:03 schrieb Ted Yu <[email protected]>:

> Timo:
> I went through namenode log and didn't find much clue.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Timo Schaepe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hey Ted Yu,
>> 
>> I had digging the name node log and so far I've found nothing special. No
>> Exception, FATAL or ERROR message nor anything other peculiarities.
>> Only I see a lot of messages like this:
>> 
>> 2013-12-12 13:53:22,541 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.StateChange: Removing
>> lease on
>> /hbase/Sessions_1091/d04cadb1b2252dafc476c138e9651ca7/.splits/9717de41277e207c24359a18dae72cd3/l/58ab2c11ca9b4b4994ce54bac0bb4c68.d04cadb1b2252dafc476c138e9651ca7
>> from client DFSClient_hb_rs_baur-hbase7.baur.boreus.de
>> ,60020,1386712527761_1295065721_26
>> 2013-12-12 13:53:22,541 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.StateChange: DIR*
>> completeFile:
>> /hbase/Sessions_1091/d04cadb1b2252dafc476c138e9651ca7/.splits/9717de41277e207c24359a18dae72cd3/l/58ab2c11ca9b4b4994ce54bac0bb4c68.d04cadb1b2252dafc476c138e9651ca7
>> is closed by DFSClient_hb_rs_baur-hbase7.baur.boreus.de
>> ,60020,1386712527761_1295065721_26
>> 
>> But maybe that is normal. If you wanna have a look, you can find the log
>> snippet at
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/8sls714knn4yqp3/hadoop-hadoop-namenode-baur-hbase1.log.2013-12-12.snip
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>>        Timo
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Am 14.12.2013 um 09:12 schrieb Ted Yu <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>> Timo:
>>> Other than two occurrences of 'Took too long to split the files'
>>> @ 13:54:20,194 and 13:55:10,533, I don't find much clue from the posted
>> log.
>>> 
>>> If you have time, mind checking namenode log for 1 minute interval
>> leading
>>> up to 13:54:20,194 and 13:55:10,533, respectively ?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Timo Schaepe <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hey,
>>>> 
>>>> @JM: Thanks for the hint with hbase.regionserver.fileSplitTimeout. At
>> the
>>>> moment (the import is actually working) and after I splittet the
>> specific
>>>> regions manually, we do not have growing regions anymore.
>>>> 
>>>> hbase hbck says, all things are going fine.
>>>> 0 inconsistencies detected.
>>>> Status: OK
>>>> 
>>>> @Ted Yu: Sure, have a look here: http://pastebin.com/2ANFVZEU
>>>> The relevant tablename ist data_1091.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your time.
>>>> 
>>>>       Timo
>>>> 
>>>> Am 13.12.2013 um 20:18 schrieb Ted Yu <[email protected]>:
>>>> 
>>>>> Timo:
>>>>> Can you pastebin regionserver log around 2013-12-12 13:54:20 so that we
>>>> can
>>>>> see what happened ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Try to increase hbase.regionserver.fileSplitTimeout but put it back to
>>>> its
>>>>>> default value after.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Default value is 30 seconds. I think it's not normal for a split to
>> take
>>>>>> more than that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What is your hardware configuration?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Have you run hbck to see if everything is correct?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> JM
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2013/12/13 Timo Schaepe <[email protected]>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello again,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> digging in the logs of the specific regionserver shows me that:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2013-12-12 13:54:20,194 INFO
>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.SplitRequest: Running
>>>>>> rollback/cleanup
>>>>>>> of failed split of
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> data,OR\x83\xCF\x02\x82\xAE\xF3U,1386851456415.d04cadb1b2252dafc476c138e9651ca7.;
>>>>>>> Took too long to split the files and create the references, aborting
>>>>>> split
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This message appears two time, so it seems, that HBase tried to split
>>>> the
>>>>>>> region but it failed. I don't know why. How is the behaviour of
>> HBase,
>>>>>> if a
>>>>>>> region split fails? Are there more tries to split this region again?
>> I
>>>>>>> didn't find any new tries in the log. Now I split the big regions
>>>>>> manually
>>>>>>> and this works. And also it seems, that HBase split the new regions
>>>> again
>>>>>>> to crunch they down to the given limit.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But also it is a mystery for me, why the split size in Hannibal shows
>>>> me
>>>>>>> 10 GB and in base-site.xml I put 2 GB…
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>      Timo
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 13.12.2013 um 10:22 schrieb Timo Schaepe <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> during the loading of data in our cluster I noticed some strange
>>>>>>> behavior of some regions, that I don't understand.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Scenario:
>>>>>>>> We convert data from a mysql database to HBase. The data is inserted
>>>>>>> with a put to the specific HBase table. The row key is a timestamp. I
>>>>>> know
>>>>>>> the problem with timestamp keys, but in our requirement it works
>> quiet
>>>>>>> well. The problem is now, that there are some regions, which are
>>>> growing
>>>>>>> and growing.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> For example the table on the picture [1]. First, all data was
>>>>>>> distributed over regions and node. And now, the data is written into
>>>> only
>>>>>>> one region, which is growing and I can see no splitting at all.
>>>> Actually
>>>>>>> the size of the big region is nearly 60 GB.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> HBase version is 0.94.11. I cannot understand, why the splitting is
>>>> not
>>>>>>> happening. In hbase-site.xml I limit the hbase.hregion.max.filesize
>> to
>>>> 2
>>>>>> GB
>>>>>>> and HBase accepted this value.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> <property>
>>>>>>>>    <!--Loaded from hbase-site.xml-->
>>>>>>>>    <name>hbase.hregion.max.filesize</name>
>>>>>>>>    <value>2147483648</value>
>>>>>>>> </property>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> First mystery: Hannibal shows me the split size is 10 GB (see
>>>>>>> screenshot).
>>>>>>>> Second mystery: HBase is not splitting some regions neither at 2 GB
>>>> nor
>>>>>>> 10 GB.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Any ideas? Could be the timestamp rowkey cause this problem?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    Timo
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/lm286xkcpglnj1t/big_region.png
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to